EvidenceArchitectural inferencev1.10.0

Source Report — Threat Assessment: Autonomous Self-Replicating Modular Artificial Intelligence

Evidence levelArchitectural inference

This evidence page summarizes an uploaded report that informed the v1.8.0 content expansion. It is a source dossier, not an independently verified consensus source.

Claim

Second threat assessment focused on modular AI ecologies, algorithmic mitosis/meiosis, evaluator drift, and defense architecture.

Source and preservation

FieldValue
Source typeUploaded Markdown source report
Raw preservation pathdocs/source-reports/raw-markdown/ai-self-replication-threat-assessment-part-2.md
Public-safe summary pathdocs/source-report-summaries/ai-self-replication-threat-assessment-part-2.md
Date last reviewed in UTC2026-06-27T00:35:00Z
Evidence categoryArchitectural inference

What the evidence does show

The report provides a structured conceptual treatment that can be used to expand Cognivirus.com terminology, risk maps, and control guidance.

What the evidence does not show

The report alone does not prove that every named scenario is current, universal, or independently replicated. Claims about specific incidents, attack success rates, or future timelines require primary-source review before being presented as demonstrated fact.

Site interpretation

This report contributes to the v1.8.0 expansion through public-safe concepts: transition graphs, adapter reproduction boundaries, persistence reservoirs, evaluator drift, execution-time control, and human-incentive safety boundaries.