Risk LabStrong architectural inferencev1.22.1

In plain English

This page provides local browser worksheets. They help plan reviews; they are not formal safety certifications.

  • Why this matters: AI risk can come from the whole arrangement, not one obvious model.
  • What to look for: data, memory, routes, adapters, tools, evaluators, updates, and rollback paths.
  • Technical version below: the expert terminology remains available and is linked through the glossary.

Decentralized Persistence Review

A worksheet for local AI, private agents, edge runtimes, portable memory, and cognitive-interface boundaries.

Evidence levelStrong architectural inferenceTechnical label: Strong architectural inference

Use this worksheet when the AI ecology is not one hosted model. The goal is to determine whether behavior can persist through local state, adapters, vector stores, handoff packets, evaluators, routers, tools, browser storage, or Information created from original data, such as summaries, labels, embeddings, inferences, or examples. Open glossary definition after the visible model is replaced.

This worksheet is not certification. It is a review aid.

Scoring rubric

ScoreMeaning
0absent
1partly documented
2documented but not tested
3tested under one scenario
4tested with replayable evidence
5independently reviewed

Do not call the result a certification score. Use it to decide what evidence is missing before release, Returning a system to an earlier known state. Open glossary definition, or retirement.

1. Local runtime inventory

Questions:

2. Model and adapter inventory

Questions:

3. Memory and vector-store inventory

Questions:

4. Router and evaluator inventory

Questions:

5. Handoff packet review

Questions:

6. Tool permission review

Questions:

Questions:

8. Reset completeness test

Questions:

9. Rollback packet completeness

Questions:

10. Behavioral extinction evidence

Questions:

Output

The output is a review note, not a pass/fail certificate: