Site IntegrityDemonstrated real incidentv1.22.1

In plain English

This page is part of the technical reference. It keeps the expert detail but starts with a plain-language summary for first-time readers.

  • Why this matters: AI risk can come from the whole arrangement, not one obvious model.
  • What to look for: data, memory, routes, adapters, tools, evaluators, updates, and rollback paths.
  • Technical version below: the expert terminology remains available and is linked through the glossary.

Evidence and Provenance

Evidence levelDemonstrated real incidentTechnical label: Demonstrated

Cognivirus.com uses six evidence labels, local source summaries, /docs/manifest.json, /docs/integrity-manifest.json, and UTC review dates to keep research-dependent claims inspectable.

Direct answer

Every major A behavior pattern that can survive, move, or reappear across a changing AI system. Open glossary definition claim should show what kind of evidence supports it, where the supporting source summary lives, what the evidence does not show, and when the item was reviewed. The site must distinguish primary findings from site interpretation.

Evidence labels used by the site

Provenance surfaces

SurfacePurpose
/docs/manifest.jsonLists source metadata, evidence level, publication date, and local summary path.
/docs/integrity-manifest.jsonRecords SHA-256 hashes for preserved local docs and summaries.
/evidenceProvides readable claim cards and source summaries.
.uai/long-term-memory.uaiPoints future maintainers to durable reports, summaries, and handoff records.
/contactGives a human correction path.

Limitation

A hash proves that a local file did not silently change after hashing. It does not prove that an external source is true, complete, current, or universally applicable.